THE SITE OF JUSTIN SHADY + WAYNE CHINSANG
January 28, 2010 in Blogs! | Tags: Andrew Breitbart, Andrew Breitbart is a dickbag, asshead, David Shuster, dickbag, James O'Keefe, Joseph Basel, loudmouthed asshead, MSNBC, Robert Flanagan, Senator Mary Landrieu, Stan Dai
…and kudos to MSNBC’s David Shuster for not letting this loudmouthed asshead walk all over him:
Breitbart eats fat dinger,
Comments feed for this article
January 28, 2010 at 1:33 pm
HOLY SHIT…what a fucking douche!!!!!!
January 28, 2010 at 1:38 pm
Douche! Did he think that was going to go well or make him seem the hero? I guess if I was in the Habit of wearing a tinfoil hat I might be inclined to support him.
January 28, 2010 at 1:54 pm
January 28, 2010 at 2:40 pm
That dude should be thrown into a cage with hungry panthers.
January 28, 2010 at 3:08 pm
January 28, 2010 at 4:43 pm
I’m starting to believe that Andrew Breitbart is a dickbag.
January 28, 2010 at 4:47 pm
Typical fuckin’ “change the subject when asked what you don’t want to tell” bullshit.
January 28, 2010 at 5:56 pm
“this is why the human race falls apart” said by a smarter, younger member of my family.
January 28, 2010 at 6:00 pm
January 29, 2010 at 9:54 am
That was one of the most frustrating things I’ve sat through in months. Both of them were interrupting douches. This is why I can’t watch “news” channels.
January 31, 2010 at 6:50 am
I don’t know, man. I’m completely unfamiliar with the story, so I’m looking at this blind; what I saw was David Shuster trying to beat this guy into a soundbite admission on any front, while Breitbart wanted to use this time to wrest an admission of guilt from Shuster, holding *him* personally responsible for MSNBC’s slanderous remarks, among other things.
“They’re calling him Watergate Junior!” (“That’s because MSNBC started it!”) [SIC] That’s like Kim Il Jong ? requiring his people to refer to him as Great Leader so that he in turn can look to his interviewers and say, “See? They call me Great Leader! They MUST love me!”
Shuster kept changing the topic, giving Breitbart more and more to address and respond to while Shuster, relying heavily on bridging and blocking, would then return to a centerline of neutrality and drive the point home with a moment of silence and that smug *look* that silently accuses Breitbart of being an ass and a child. If you watch it with no sound, you’re gonna side with Shuster because Breitbart LOOKS like a windbag. Slack jaws, huge mouth, no tie. Shuster looks like clean authority in a crisp suit and a tie.
This doesn’t mean the end of the world. It’s just the silent art of public manipulation, which began well before the Nixon/Kennedy televised debate, but that’s a good example as any to compare it to.
Sorry, just had to share my two cents. Keep up the good work!
January 31, 2010 at 6:05 pm
First, don’t get me wrong, I’m not PRO-Shuster. I think they’re pretty much ALL dickbags.
I’m just very anti-Breitbart. And if you watch that video, the thing I hate Breitbart MOST for is skirting around questions. He was trying to make Shuster accountable for something he Tweeted, sure. But that’s not the point. He is a GUEST and was asked a QUESTION. If he didn’t want to answer any of the questions, he shouldn’t have been on the fucking show.
He skirted every question. They asked him about O’Keefe being on his payroll, and he danced around it like a bitch.
Shuster: (paraphrasing) Was O’Keefe insane?
Breitbart: He was insane for what MSNBC said… blah blah blah… panty bomber… blah blah blah… Are you going to retract that?
Shuster: How much did you pay O’Keefe?
Breitbart: How much money did MSNBC take from the Obama bailout?
January 31, 2010 at 7:10 am
One quick add: just found this example of Shuster’s questionable behavior on MSNBC: http://tinyurl.com/ylksdak You’ve always been one to speak your mind, Shady, and I admire that, so I thank you for allowing me a few seconds here. We, the viewing public, get bombarded with a LOT of info during the course of a day and there’s a lot of stuff we’re half-expected to form and hold an opinion on. I think the more we’re bombarded with, the easier it is for us to throw up our hands and say, “Fuck it. Here’s my money, here’s my loyalty, now leave me alone!” I’m satisfied that I made the right choice in this instance based on the information I was presented with (outside of meeting the man in an unscripted enviornment)
Not that it really matters in the grand scheme, or that I’ll even remember this in a week!
July 21, 2010 at 10:19 am
Andrew Breitbart is STILL a dickbag… « THE BLARG
[…] I’ve said it before, […]
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.Ben Eastaugh and Chris Sternal-Johnson.
Subscribe to feed.